Search. Or just try integrating....

Tuesday, March 14, 2017

30: Problem 30.10

INTRO:
The current in a 100 watt lightbulb is 0.870 A . The filament inside the bulb is 0.230 mm in diameter.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART A:
What is the current density in the filament?
Express your answer to three significant figures and include the appropriate units.

SOLUTION:
Current density is simply current divided by area...
The area = A = πr2 = π/4⋅d2

⇒ J = (0.87 A)/[π/4⋅(2.3×10-4 m)2]
J = 2.09×107 A/m2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART B:
What is the electron current in the filament?
Express your answer using three significant figures.

SOLUTION:
current = charge/ time
1 Amp = 1 C/s

using equation (30.11) ... I = e⋅ie
where e is the charge of an electron
∴ ie = I/e
and I, in terms of C/s -> I = 0.87 C/s

→ ie = (0.87 C/s)/(-1.602×10-19 C/electron)
ie = 5.43×10-19 electron/s

30: Problem 30.6

PART A:
How many conduction electrons are there in a 4.50 mm diameter gold wire that is 20.0 cm long?

SOLUTION:
signature first step...
Givens/ conversions:
Diameter ≡ d = 4.50 mm = 0.0045 m
Length ≡ l = 20.0 cm = 0.200 m

Using Table 30.1...
neGOLD = 5.9×1028 m-3

And we need to determine Ne... 

Equation (30.2) states that Ne = ne⋅V
We can determine volume by V = A⋅l = (π/4)d2⋅l
∴ Ne = ne⋅(π/4)d2⋅l
= (5.9×1028 m-3)(π/4)⋅(0.0045 m)2⋅(0.200 m)
Ne = 1.88×1023 electrons
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART B:
How far must the sea of electrons in the wire move to deliver -38.0 nC of charge to an electrode?
Express your answer with the appropriate units.

SOLUTION:
So we know from part A that in 0.2 m, there are 1.877×1023 electrons ...

each electron has a charge of -1 e, or -1.602×10-19 C
and that 1 nC = 1×10-9 C, or 1×10-9 C/nC = 1×109 C/nC....
this means that the desired charge = -38×10-9 C

The total charge created by that many electrons is simply equal to the number of electrons multiplied by the charge or each individual electron, or Qtot = Qe⋅Ne

The charge per unit length can be determined by dividing the total charge by the length from part A.

Q/l = Qe⋅Ne/l = (-1.602×10-19 C)(1.877×1023)/(0.2 m)
→ Q/l = -1.504×105 C/m
lets call this QperLength
The total length (L) required to contain a total charge (Qf) may then be solved for by ... L = Qf/QperLength = l⋅Qf/(Qe⋅Ne
→ L = (0.2 m)(-38×10-9 C)/[(-1.602×10-19 C)(1.877×1023)]
⇒ L = 2.528×10-13 m

Which is a really small number... which brings us to the last aspect. Units... I think that the units (which are units of length, of course) are most likely going to be desired in the same units that the length in part A was expressed, so centimeters... 
102 cm/m... so
L = 2.53×10-11 cm

30: Problem 30.2

INTRO:
1.00 × 1020 electrons flow through a cross section of a 4.50-mm-diameter iron wire in 6.00 s .

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PART A:
What is the electron drift speed?

SOLUTION:
Some basics that I learned (by reading! :D):
We can cause a net motion of electrons through a metal by pushing on them with an electric field. This net motion is called the drift speed, symbolized by vd.

The number of electrons (Ne) that pass through a cross section during a time interval (Δt) is defined in eq. (30.1) → Ne = ie⋅Δt
where ie is the electron current​

The electrons that travel a distance Δx during the time interval, form a cylinder of charge with volume V = A Δx
where A is the cross-sectional area of the cylinder​

if the 'number density' (ne) is an element describing the electrons per volume, or cubic meter, then the total number of electrons in the cylinder is given in eq. (30.2) → Ne = ne⋅V = ne⋅A⋅Δx = ne⋅A⋅vd⋅Δt​

using equations (30.1) & (30.2)...
Ne = ie⋅Δt = ne A⋅vd⋅Δt
→ Ne/Δt = ie = ne A⋅vd
→ Ne/(Δt⋅ne⋅A) = vd
lets call that eq. (A), for now​

Looking back at the initial givens, let's go ahead and do my signature first step...
Givens/ conversions:​
Number of electrons ≡ Ne = 1.00×1020
Diameter ≡ d = 4.50 mm = 0.0045 m
Time passed ≡ Δt = 6.00 s

We know the cross-sectional area ≡ A = πr2 = π/4⋅d2
so, we can simplify eq. (A) into almost all givens/ knowns ...
vd = Ne/(Δt⋅ne⋅π/4⋅d2)​

but what is this number density thing... well it's actually a constant determined by the type of metal that the electrons are flowing through! It's given in table 30.1 in the book but I also included it below, for easy reference.
The intro states that the wire's material is iron.
so, using table 30.1... 
ne = 8.5×1028 m-3

∴ vd = Ne/(Δt⋅ne⋅π/4⋅d2) = (1.00×1020)/((6.00 s)⋅(8.5×1028 m-3)⋅(π/4)⋅(0.0045 m)2)
⇒vd =1.233×10-5 m/s​

They want units of μm/s, so multiply through by 106 μm/m
vd =12.33 μm/s​

28: Problem 28.19

INTRO:
A 3.4-cm-diameter parallel-plate capacitor has a 1.6 mm spacing. The electric field strength inside the capacitor is 8.0×104 V/m .
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART A:
What is the potential difference across the capacitor?
Express your answer to two significant figures and include the appropriate units.

SOLUTION:
My favorite first step,​
Givens/ conversions:
diameter ≡ d = 3.4 cm = 0.034 m
spacing ≡ s = 1.6 mm = 0.0016 m
Electric field inside ≡ E = 8.0×104 V/m

using equation 28.5, for the electric potential inside a parallel-plate capacitor: V = Es

so, V = (8.0×104 V/m)(0.0016 m) = 128 V

the frustrating kicker here, it got me anyway, is that the instructions say to express your solution to two significant figures. 
128 has 3 sigfigs. annoying. You have to round up to 130...
ΔVC = 130 V

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PART B:
How much charge is on each plate?
Express your answer to two significant figures and include the appropriate units.

SOLUTION:
An electric field is considered to be a surface charge density (with units of C/m2) divided by the vacuum permittivity constant (with units C/Vm). This means that the surface charge density, η, can be calculated by multiplying the electric field by the vacuum permittivity constant. 
η=E⋅ε0
the surface charge density is basically the charge distributed over an area, or η = Q/A
therefore, to solve for the charge, 
Q = ηA = E⋅ε0⋅A
The area is just the area of the circular plate, or A = πr2 = π/4 ⋅ d2
∴ Q = E⋅ε0⋅π/4⋅d2
= (8.0×104 V/m)(π/4)(8.854×10-12 C/Vm)(0.034 m)2
⇒ Q = 6.431×10-10 C​
but don't forget sigfigs... it only wants two...
Q = 6.4×10-10 C​

28: PSS 25.2 The Electric Potential of a Continuous Distribution of Charge

INTRO:
To practice Problem-Solving Strategy 25.2 for continuous charge distribution problems.
A straight rod of length L has a positive charge Q distributed along its length. Find the electric potential due to the rod at a point located a distance d from one end of the rod along the line extending from the rod. (Figure 1)


Figure 1

PROBLEM-SOLVING STRATEGY 25.2 The electric potential of a continuous distribution of charge
MODEL: Model the charges as a simple shape, such as a line or a disk. Assume the charge is uniformly distributed.
VISUALIZE: For the pictorial representation:
Draw a picture and establish a coordinate system.
Identify the point P at which you want to calculate the electric potential.
Divide the total charge Q into small pieces of charge ΔQ using shapes for which you already know how to determine V. This division is often, but not always, into point charges.
Identify distances that need to be calculated.
SOLVE: The mathematical representation is V=ΣVi.
Use superposition to form an algebraic expression for the potential at P.
Let the (x,y,z) coordinates remain as variables.
Replace the small charge ΔQ with an equivalent expression involving a charge density and a coordinate, such as dx, that describes the shape of charge ΔQ. This is the critical step in making the transition from a sum to an integral because you need a coordinate to serve as an integration variable.
Express all distances in terms of the coordinates.
Let the sum become an integral. The integration will be over the coordinate variable that is related to ΔQ. The integration limits for this variable will depend on the coordinate system you have chosen. Carry out the integration, and simplify the result.
ASSESS: Check that your result is consistent with any limits for which you know what the potential should be.

Model
No information is provided on the rod's cross section. For simplicity, assume that its diameter is much smaller than the rod's length. You can, then, model the rod as a line of charge.

Visualize
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART A:
To most efficiently solve this problem, you should divide the rod into pieces of charge that consist of...

- thin lines of charge of length L  and a very small cross section
- thin 'slices' of the rod cut parallel to the axis of the rod
- thin 'slices' of the rod cut perpendicular to the axis of the rod

SOLUTION:
First, model the rod as a line of charge. Then, divide the line into many small segments, each of length Δx. Each segment can, then, be modeled as a point charge. The potential due to such a point charge can be determined in a relatively straightforward manner.

∴ option #3, thin 'slices' of the rod cut perpendicular to the axis of the rod
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART B:
Choose a coordinate system where +x is to the right and +y is upward. Place the origin of your coordinate system at the left end of the rod, and choose point P to be located beyond the right end of the rod, as shown in the picture to the left.
What is the distance ri between point P and a piece of charge located at position xi?
Express your answer in terms of some or all of the quantities xi, L, Q, and d.

SOLUTION:
A pictorial representation for this problem might look like:

ri = (L+d)-xi
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART C:
Find the electric potential VP at point P.
Express your answer in terms of d, L, Q, and ϵ0.

SOLUTION:
The mathematical expression for the potential is V=ΣVi. 
Because of the nature of the problem, which deals with a continuous distribution of charge rather than a point-like distribution, the sum must be treated as an integral. 

To set up the summation and find what to integrate, follow the steps listed in the strategy ^^

After dividing the total charge into small segments, and modeling each segment as a point charge, as in Part A, construct a mathematical expression for Vi, the electric potential due to segment i. 
Treat xi, the x coordinate of segment i, as a variable (just call it x), and express the charge on that segment in terms of said x. 

Finally, let ΣVi become an integral and use calculus to evaluate the integral...

FIND... the electric potential Vi at point P due to the charge segment located at the variable position 
x

The formula for the electric potential of a point charge involves the distance from the charge to the point where the potential is to be computed.
Recall that, in Part B, you obtained an expression relating the distance between point P and charge segment i to the x coordinate of the charge segment.......

The formula for electric potential is... 
Uelec = k q1q2/r
and we all know what k is so that will be temporarily ignored...

The immediate distance between the two points is ri, as determined in part B... 

U = k q1q2/r ...  then just plug in for r as ri ...
Vi = k ⋅ΔQ/(L+d-xi)

Next you need to understand the expression for the charge of a small segment
So calculus is kind of annoying at first, but these topics are actually really important to understand. especially later on (trust me)..

Because you will integrate with respect to coordinate x, it is important to express the charge on a segment, ΔQ, in terms of its length Δx.

So you gotta find a mathematical expression for ΔQ, while assuming the charge is uniformly distributed along the rod (since that's given). 

Recall that the total charge on the rod is Q and the rod's length is L...
that means that the change in charge over the change in x is simply the charge divided by the length, or...
ΔQ/Δx = Q/L
by rearranging this to solve for ΔQ...
ΔQ = Δx⋅Q/L

plug that into your initial Vi equation for ΔQ, 
Vi = k ⋅Δx⋅Q/L ⋅/(L+d-xi)
you now have an integrable function..
Vi = ∫k⋅Q/L⋅(L+d-xi) Δx = ∫k⋅Q/L⋅(L+d-x) dx
integrate from 0 to L, because the d is already attributed... 

k is constant, Q is constant, L is constant, so you can just pull that out...
→k⋅Q/L ⋅∫1/(L+d-x) dx
use substitution...
let u = L+d-x, ∴du = -dx

→k⋅Q/L⋅∫1/(u) -du
→k⋅Q/L⋅-ln(u) (from 0 to L)usub
→k⋅Q/L⋅-ln(L+d-x) (from 0 to L)
→k⋅Q/L⋅[-ln(L+d-L) - -ln(L+d-0)]
→k⋅Q/L⋅[-ln(d) + ln(L+d)]
using law of logs, subtracting them is the same as dividing them...
→k⋅Q/L⋅ln[(L+d)/d] = k⋅Q/L⋅ln[L/d +d/d]
⇒Vp = k⋅Q/L⋅ln[1+ L/d] = Q/4Lπε0⋅ln[1+ L/d]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART D:
Imagine that distance d is much greater than the length of the rod. Intuitively, the potential should be approximately the same as the potential at a distance d from which of the following charge distributions?

- an infinitely long wire with total charge Q
- an infinitely long wire with total charge Qd/L
- a point charge of magnitude Q
- an electric dipole with moment QL

SOLUTION:
From far away, a short rod looks very much like a simple point charge. Not surprisingly, the mathematical expression you obtained for the potential does reduce to that of a point charge if L/d≪1:

In other words, since L is constant, the larger d is, the smaller L/d gets. When L/d is really small, the logarithm is basically just the logarithm of 1 plus that tiny little amount. The ln(1) = 0, and oddly enough, at really close proximity to 1, those values follow the rule :

if x << 1 & ln(1+x), then ln(1+x) ≈ x​
try this with x = 0.001, for example... ln(0.001) = 0.0009995 ≈ 0.001

therefore, Q/4Lπε0⋅ln[1+ L/d] where L/d << 1 ≈ Q/4Lπε0⋅L/d 
⇒ or, ≈ Q/4dπε0

Therefore, the third option is correct. or, 
a point charge of magnitude Q​

Monday, March 13, 2017

28: PSS 25.1 Conservation of Energy in Charge Interactions

INTRO:
A proton and an alpha particle are momentarily at rest at a distance r from each other. They then begin to move apart. Find the speed of the proton by the time the distance between the proton and the alpha particle doubles.
Both particles are positively charged. The charge and the mass of the proton are, respectively, e and m. The charge and the mass of the alpha particle are, respectively, 2e and 4m.

PROBLEM-SOLVING STRATEGY 25.1 Conservation of energy in charge interactions
MODEL: Check whether there are any dissipative forces that would prevent the mechanical energy from being conserved.
VISUALIZE: Draw a before-and-after pictorial representation. Define symbols that will be used in the problem, list known values, and identify what you are trying to find.
SOLVE: The mathematical representation is based on the law of conservation of mechanical energy:
Kf+qVf=Ki+qVi.
Is the electric potential given in the problem statement? If not, you'll need to use a known potential, such as that of a point charge, or calculate the potential using the procedure given in Problem-Solving Strategy 25.2.
Kand Kare the sums of kinetic energies of all moving particles.
Some problems may need additional conservation laws, such as conservation of charge or conservation of momentum.
ASSESS: Check that your result has the correct units and significant figures, is reasonable, and answers the question.

Model
The particles described in this problem interact under the effect of the electric force, which is a conservative force, so the system's mechanical energy is conserved.

Visualize
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART A:
Which of the following quantities are unknown?
A. initial separation of the particles
B. final separation of the particles
C. initial speed of the proton
D. initial speed of the alpha particle
E. final speed of the proton
F. final speed of the alpha particle
G. mass of the proton
H. mass of the alpha particle
I. charge of the proton
J. charge of the alpha particle

Enter the letters of all the correct answers in alphabetical order. Do not use commas. For instance, if A, C, and D are unknowns, enter ACD.

SOLUTION:
The final separation between the particles is, essentially, known: It is twice the initial separation, or 2r. In this problem, then, there are really only two unknowns: the final speed of the proton, (vf)p, which is what you are trying to find, and the final speed of the alpha particle, (vf)α.

Recall that a problem with two unknowns requires two equations to be solved. Here, the law of conservation of mechanical energy provides one of the equations. To find the second equation, think what other physical quantity besides energy is conserved, and translate that into a mathematical expression. But before you do that, it's helpful if you complete a before-and-after pictorial representation of the problem. Your drawing might look like this:
answer: BEF
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART B:
Find the speed of the proton (vf)p by the time the distance between the particles doubles.
Express your answer in terms of some or all of the quantities e, m, r, and ϵ0.

SOLUTION:
Using the law of conservation of mechanical energy, we know that the sum of the initial energies is equal to the sum of the final energies. 

At first, when the two particles are right next to each other, there is no kinetic energy yet, but quite a bit of potential energy.  
The potential energy can be written using U = qV -> Uelec = 1/[4π⋅ϵ0]⋅q1q2/dist

Therefore, since initial dist = r, q1 = e & q2 = 2e
The initial potential energy = 
Ui = 1/[4π⋅ϵ0]⋅2e⋅e/r = 1/[4π⋅ϵ0]⋅2e2/r

and sine the final dist = 2r,
the final potential energy = 
Uf = 1/[4π⋅ϵ0]⋅2e⋅e/r = 1/[4π⋅ϵ0]⋅e2/r

What about the kinetic energy? 
if the particles start at rest, then the initial kinetic energy = 
Ki = 0

the total final kinetic energy will be equal to the final kinetic energy of the proton plus the final kinetic energy of the alpha. But how can we relate these two velocities to each other? 
The only quantity that remains constant for the proton and alpha as they move apart is their magnitude of momentum. 
momentum : P = m*v
conservation of momentum: ∑P1 = ∑P2
∴ vα1⋅mα + vp1⋅mp = vα2⋅mα + vp2⋅mp
since both initial velocities are 0, 
0 = vα2⋅mα + vp2⋅mp
→vα⋅mα = vp⋅mp
→vα/vp = mp/mα = m/4m = 0.25
∴ vα = (0.25)vp

KE = 1/2 mv2
∴ KE = 1/2mαvα2 + 1/2mpvp2 
sub in for vα = (0.25)vp...
KE = 1/2(4m)((0.25)vp)2 + 1/2(m)vp2 
∴KE = (5/8)mvp2

plugging that into the final equation... 
0 + 1/[4π⋅ϵ0]⋅2e2/r = (5/8)mvp2 +1/[4π⋅ϵ0]⋅e2/r
then solve for v!
→ 1/[4π⋅ϵ0]⋅e2/r = (5/8)mvp2 
→ 2/[5π⋅ϵ0]⋅e2/r = mvp2 
⇒∴vp = SQRT{2⋅e2/[5r⋅m⋅π⋅ϵ0]}
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART B:
The best way to check whether your result from Part B is correct is to check that it has the correct units. Which of the following expressions, where C stands for coulombs, N for newtons, kg for kilograms, and m for meters, represents the correct SI units for the expression found in part B?


SOLUTION:
just plug in for the units... 
e ≡ C, r ≡ m, m ≡ kg, ϵ0 ≡ F/m = C2/Nm2
and all numbers have no units... 
→ v = SQRT{C2/[m⋅kg⋅C2/Nm2]]}
The C's cancel out, one of the m's cancel out, and the N jumps up to the numerator...

⇒ units = √N⋅m/kg